he shock of the drowning of two children in the English Channel this week ought to prompt the prime minister and the home secretary to rethink. Obviously, they should do so as a matter of basic humanity, but it is also worth trying to make the hard-hearted argument of pragmatism.
The present policy is plainly not working from the point of view of a government that wishes to maintain strict immigration control. The Independent would argue that the numbers coming across the Channel in small boats are not huge, but a government that wants to “take back control of our borders” ought to be offended by its failure to prevent the crossings, even if it were not also appalled at the collateral human cost.
Hence any solution needs to focus on preventing the problem at source. That means trying to reduce the desperation that drives so many to take the terrible risk of crossing, and it means better policing of the French coast to stop people setting off in the first place.